[ APPLICATIONS ]

Six missions that need more than one machine

Each is set out as a concept of operations — the problem, the sequence, the force mix, and what degrades it. No case studies, because we have not earned any yet.

Every mission below runs on the same five-step spine.
01
Detection
02
Human in the loop
03
Assignment
04
Coordinated action
05
Scale
[ Mission 05 · AIR + LAND ]
Terrain the mission is flown over
Block 01 — the problem

A position needs twenty kilograms of stores. The ground route is watched, the flying route crosses a ridge at 3,000 m, and the load is split across items that do not all need to arrive at the same time or by the same means.

↓ Concept of operations
Block 02 — concept of operations

Mixed air and ground delivery under one plan

AIRBORNE ASSETGROUND NODETARGET / CONTACTTASKINGSENSOR
AIR LAYERTARGETGROUNDA-012 KG EO/IRA-022 KG EO/IRA-042 KG EO/IRA-0320 KG RELAYTARGETTARGETT+9 HRGROUND STATIONONE OPERATOR010203040506ROUTE SPLIT
01DETECTION
Requirement received
GROUND STATION

The requesting position states what it needs and by when. Items carry priority, not just mass.

02ASSIGNMENT
Load allocated
SYSTEM

The load is split across available assets by urgency, route risk and remaining capacity.

03HUMAN IN THE LOOP
Operator approves plan
GROUND STATION

The allocation and its routes are shown as one plan for approval, not as separate tasks.

04COORDINATED ACTION
Air leg flown
A-01, A-02 · 20 kg

Time-critical items go by air over the ridge, direct to the position.

05COORDINATED ACTION
Ground leg run
G-01 · Rover 30

Bulk and non-urgent stores go by ground on a route chosen for cover rather than speed.

06SCALE
Reallocation on closure
ALL

If a route closes mid-delivery, the remaining load is reallocated against the same priorities.

Block 03 — why this needs multiple agents
Mission 05

A resupply plan is an allocation problem across airframes, ground vehicles and time windows. One platform forces one answer for the whole load. A mixed force splits the load by urgency and by risk, and reallocates when one route closes rather than failing the whole delivery.

The rest of this page is the working detail behind that claim — the sequence, the assets, and the conditions under which it fails.↓ Force mix
Block 04 — force mix

5 assets, one operator

Each row opens the configurator preloaded with that configuration. The fleet builder template renders the same objects.
Block 05 — constraints and mitigations

What degrades this, and what the system does about it

Stated plainly because an evaluator will find these anyway. Mitigations are design decisions, not guarantees.

01
Density altitude

Above 3,000 m, payload capacity falls and the mass the plan assumed is no longer liftable.

Capacity is computed against the actual route altitude before allocation, so the plan is built on what the aircraft can carry that day.

02
Weather windows

Wind and visibility close the air leg with little warning.

Ground legs are planned as a fallback for time-critical items, not only for bulk, and the operator sees which items lose their delivery window first.

03
Delivery accuracy

A released load in wind lands wide, and a wide landing in contested ground is a lost load.

Release is computed from measured wind at altitude, and where accuracy cannot be assured the system recommends a landing delivery instead.

04
Recovery

Every delivery is one-way unless the asset returns, and return legs cost endurance nothing else can use.

Return legs are part of the allocation from the start rather than an afterthought, and are shown in the plan.

Block 06 — next

Take this mix into the fleet builder

Configure this force mix

Bring a mission, not a shortlist

We will walk the concept of operations against your requirement and say plainly where it does not fit.